Prismatic vs. Cylindrical vs. Pouch: The 2026 Engineer's Guide to Cell Pros & Cons
Release time:
2025-12-04
Prismatic battery cells offer high energy density and efficient packaging for electric vehicles (EVs), yet may present thermal management challenges as well as mechanical swelling during cycling.
Prismatic battery cells offer high energy density and efficient packaging for electric vehicles (EVs), yet may present thermal management challenges as well as mechanical swelling during cycling. They require robust external compression as well as precise laser welding of large busbars in order to maintain structural integrity over time.
Prismatic cells are the go-to option for LFP batteries like CATL, but they're far from perfect. Engineers tend to choose them for their packaging efficiency before later having difficulty cooling and swelling issues arise. At our automation services company, we witness both sides of these cells daily on production lines, so here is our honest evaluation.
1. The Advantage: Packaging Efficiency
Pro: Rectangular shapes stack seamlessly without air gaps that hinder stacking, unlike cylindrical forms. This maximizes Volumetric Energy Density.
Manufacturing Advantage: Gantry robots make grabbing and stacking easier.
Huiyao Laser Solution: With our high-speed stackers, 12-cell modules can be assembled in under 60 seconds.
2. The Disadvantage: Heat Dissipation (The Core Problem)
Cons: Large prismatic cells have the disadvantage of being too far from any cooling surfaces, causing heat to build up inside them and become trapped.
Engineering Fix: Air cooling alone will not do. Instead, liquid cooling plates welded or glued directly onto the bottom/sides may provide much-needed relief.
Huiyao Laser Solution: Our lines include Automated Thermal Compound Dispensing and Cooling Plate Laser Welding stations to maximize heat transfer.
3. The Disadvantage: Mechanical Swelling
Con: Li-ion batteries expand as they charge/discharge, creating breathing spaces within their canisters that could result in bulged sides on rigid cans that have large flat sides.
Engineering Solution: Modules should be constructed under Compression.
Our assembly fixtures provide precise Pre-Load Force (e.g. 3000N) during strapping or welding processes to combat future swelling.
Proprietary Engineering Insight: The Prismatic Cell Pre-Load Force Challenge
Mechanical Swelling is one of the key challenges of Prismatic cells. As cells cycle, their volumes may change. Without appropriate and uniform Pre-Load Force (P-L Force), structural fatigue accelerates rapidly leading to premature degradation.
Expert Conclusion: P-L Force requirements should not be chosen arbitrarily; rather, they must precisely match both cell swelling rate and structural stiffness of module.
The core engineering relationship is defined as such that:
Stiffness Coefficient of Module Structure (k) - Determined by Cooling Plate Design and End Plate Configuration.
The Square of the Maximum Relative Swelling Rate of the cell.
| Variable | Description |
| P-L Required | The required module pre-load force, typically measured in kN. |
| Stiffness Coefficient (k) | Measures the structural integrity of the module (kN/mm). |
| Max Swelling Rate | The maximum change in cell volume over its lifecycle |
Huiyao Automation Imperative: Due to this dependence, laser production lines must meet stringent standards for module assembly flatness and weld seam geometry. Only automation solutions featuring high-precision visual correction and closed-loop power control can guarantee uniform application of preload force, thus mitigating stress concentration and potential safety risks.
Scorecard: Prismatic Cell Manufacturing Complexity (Engineer's View 2026)
|
Metric |
Prismatic Cells |
Cylindrical Cells |
Pouch Cells |
|
PACK Integration Complexity |
High. Requires complex cooling plate integration and dedicated pre-load force systems. |
Medium. Mature side welding and structural adhesive processes. |
Extremely High. Prone to deformation; requires complex lateral compression structures. |
|
Thermal Management Difficulty |
High. Highly dependent on cooling plates; laser welding for sealing is mission-critical. |
Low. Standardized surface area; easier gap filling or thermal interface material. |
Medium. Primary heat transfer through top/bottom tabs. |
|
Mechanical Swelling Tolerance |
Very Low. Precise control of Pre-Load Force is a P0-level engineering challenge. |
High. Steel casing provides high structural integrity and swelling tolerance. |
Low. Designed for flexibility, but requires constant external compression. |
|
Automation OEE |
Medium-Low. Highly dependent on high-precision vision and traceability systems, tight geometric tolerances. |
Very High. Highly standardized, high-speed, mature automation lines. |
Low. Automation challenge lies in flexible handling and visual correction. |
|
Huiyao Laser Expertise |
High. Specialization in cooling plate and high-power sealed welding automation. |
Mature. Offers mature, high-speed spot welding production lines. |
Developing. Focus on tab welding and final assembly traceability. |
Conclusion
Solving the "Cons" with Automation Prismatic cells are powerful, provided you engineer around their weaknesses. Our lines handle the compression and cooling assembly for you.
See our Prismatic Solutions: Prismatic Battery Module Line
AUTHOR: The Huiyao Laser Engineering Team
A collective of solution architects and process engineers at Huiyao Laser, 100% dedicated to solving the core bottlenecks in EV and ESS battery manufacturing.
© 2025 Huiyao Laser Technology Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
key word:
